Skip to main content
Esc

Type to search

Articles / stablecoin-infra / EU to Review MiCA, as 80% of Crypto Firms Vanish in Compliance Cull

EU to Review MiCA, as 80% of Crypto Firms Vanish in Compliance Cull

Authorized CASPs
200
Number of crypto asset service providers authorized under MiCA as of May.
Previous CASPs
1,100-1,300
Estimated number of crypto asset service providers prior to MiCA implementation.
Authorized Entities in Cyprus
12
Number of entities in Cyprus that have secured authorization under MiCA.

⦿ Executive Snapshot

  • What: The European Commission is reviewing the MiCA regulation as a significant number of crypto firms have ceased operations due to compliance challenges.
  • Who: European Commission, crypto asset service providers (CASPs), industry associations, and notable firms like Tether and Circle.
  • Why it matters: The review will determine the future landscape of the EU crypto market, balancing regulatory compliance with innovation and market participation.

⦿ Key Developments

  • As of May, only 200 CASPs have been authorized under MiCA, a significant drop from 1,100-1,300 prior to its implementation.
  • In Cyprus, only 12 entities have secured authorization, with seven being established retail brokers rather than crypto-native companies.
  • The high costs of compliance have forced smaller crypto businesses to exit the EU market, as noted by zondacrypto CEO Przemysław Kral.

⦿ Strategic Context

  • The MiCA regulation aimed to harmonize the fragmented European crypto market but has inadvertently led to a consolidation dominated by well-capitalized incumbents.
  • The dual-layered licensing regime, particularly for stablecoin issuers, creates barriers that disadvantage smaller firms, potentially stifling innovation in the sector.

⦿ Strategic Implications

  • The immediate consequence is a shrinking number of compliant firms, which may reduce competition and innovation in the EU crypto space.
  • Long-term implications could include the emergence of a two-tier system, where only larger firms thrive, while smaller players are pushed to unregulated markets.

⦿ Risks & Constraints

  • A potential risk includes the migration of clients to offshore platforms that lack EU oversight, undermining investor protection efforts.
  • Regulatory challenges may persist as the EU navigates balancing compliance costs with maintaining a competitive and innovative crypto market.

⦿ Watchlist / Forward Signals

  • The results of the current consultation will provide insights into the future trajectory of MiCA and its impact on the crypto landscape.
  • The upcoming deadline of July 1 for the grandfathering period of MiCA will be a critical milestone for many CASPs still seeking authorization.
§ 08

Related Articles